Search This Blog

Monday, October 19, 2020

Conspiracy: FBI Anon


A quick warning: there’s some heavy language used in this write-up along with some fairly sensitive topics that are discussed. Though it involves 4Chan, that shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone. In spite of that, I figured that it would be better if I just address that so nobody gets butthurt if they were to read this and complain that I didn’t censor any of the naughty words and/or had the audacity to cover it. It’s an election year and the influence that a topic like the one discussed in this write-up has can be fairly significant—especially in the era of the Internet.

Before we begin this story, I would like to take a moment to state that the  blog has been reverted to Blogger’s default coloration. I did this primarily due to how the dreary tone didn’t mesh well with the generally upbeat tone of my writing. There was also how the white text was a pain to read if I wanted to revisit my old stuff to see if I thought it would be worth rewriting.

Now, with that said, I do know that some folks prefer the darker background—especially if you’re reading at night. I agree and I will do what I can to make sure that the best of both worlds is met. As such, I promise that if/when I make my own website that it will have a light mode and dark mode option. Until then, I believe that this blog is more about vibrancy and life; a place where the overwhelming morbid nature of mysteries is counteracted by writing that isn’t overly serious. With that said, let’s get to the story.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation—or simply FBI—is a contentious entity in the United States. The center of a great many memes, their work is admirable and has helped to make the world a safer place, but in the past has led to several controversies thanks to less-than savory Directors. Alas, the Bureau has marched on and become a symbol of protection—and evil.

Indeed, there is a fair bit of division in the public eye when it comes to the Bureau. While the majority of Americans trust them, their figureheads have historically been divisive. The current Director, Chris Wray, is well liked by some and seen as spineless by others. His predecessor, James Comey, was seen that way too. Prior to him, Robert Mueller (who served as the Special Council head in the Russian interference fiasco) was also divisive. Heck, almost every FBI Director has been divisive.

The only ones who haven’t been are J. Edgar Hoover, William Sessions, and Louis Freeh. The reason? They were widely reviled by nearly everyone. Hoover is seen as one of the worst leaders of anything in American history, Sessions utilized government funding to lavish himself, and Freeh was a clown masquerading as J. Edgar Hoover.

Now, does any of this inherently mean the Bureau is evil? I wouldn’t say so. Each Special Agent is, at their heart, human. They’re subject to their own flaws and I would guess that they mean well in their intentions. Though of course, those they follow are subject to extreme scrutiny. That’s why with today’s story, the figurehead will play a very, very vital role—in this case, James Comey.

You see, back in the wonderful year of 2016, there was a fellow who’s become known as FBI Anon. He posted a great many things on 4Chan’s controversial /pol/ board that made a lot of users raise their eyebrows in surprise. Though was any of it true? Well, let’s see if we can find out.

The Story

Our story today is a bit on the light side when it comes to actual information to convey. Given it was a 4Chan post, we’re going to instead spend most of our time reading through a thread—or rather two. So rather than linger here, let’s instead get to that.

On July 2, 2016, an anonymous user posted the following message onto a thread.

I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case. I will

answer as many questions as I can without giving too much away.

This user, who later became known as FBI Anon, would go on to answer a boatload of questions, which we shall now do. The following was all found on this pdf file, which was linked to from, which hosts a large amount of QAnon-related information. So all credit goes to them. I also didn’t fix any of the grammatical errors in the questions or answers, so be prepared for some good old fashioned piss poor grammar. I’ve also kept all image file names intact for an authentic 4Chan experience. Now, with that said, let’s jump into the first two threads that involved FBI Anon.

Thread 1

Question #1: Will the Hillary get pregnant again?

Answer: Hopefully not.

Question #2: Why are you on 4chan on a Friday night?

Answer: Sent home, awaiting word about the shitstorm Lynch just caused.

Question #3: Will she be indicted?

Answer: There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders.

There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.

Question #4: What reason have we to believe you?

Answer: None. It’s better that way.

Question #5: What are they going to talk to her about tomorrow?

Answer: Legal is asking preliminary questions about whether or not she has been coached (she has) and setting up the general line of questioning. I am a high level analyst though, so my job is only to look at her records.

Question #6: “People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is”

Can you elaborate on that?

Answer: The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the Clinton Foundation. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.

Question #7: “the entire government to be brought down”

I very much doubt this.

Answer: She had SAP level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declaration of war.

Question #8: Let me guess “it’s real deep guys I swear! I just can’t tell you about it because it’s secret!”

You’re a liar, friend.

Answer: Believe what you will.

Question #9: “I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case.”

How long before you tragically shoot yourself in the back of the head from at least three feet away from two different angles, or suffer from an ulcer that decapitates you with a knife? Because people with dirt on the Clintons have a shocking tendency to jump off tall buildings

and board faulty aircraft.

Answer: We are all worried about that.

Question #10: Would you support me killing her if you fail? I don’t trust you, so I am preparing myself to take her out if need be.

Answer: Killing Hillary would not cause this problem to go away. The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imgine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people. Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece - albeit a big piece - of this massive shitstorm.

Question #11: Do you think the DOJ will protect Hillary like Holder did for Petraeus?

Answer: The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself. Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.

Question #12: You don’t agree that a message has to be sent by the people to protect the sanctity of the position? I do prefer the peaceful way, to be honest. But it’s the constant fear you’re going to fuck it up that grips me.

Answer: My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, which is why Hillary’s death would not cease the investigation or prevent further scandals. Many, many people are involved.

Question #13: Will Comey resign if there is enough evidence to indict but is forced not to indict? Was Lynch saying that she will accept any recommendation from the FBI really means she knows they are not going to indict?

Answer: There already is enough to indict. Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C. But this case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests. It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.

What Lynch is saying is she will accept whatever they do and make her determination as she will. Nothing about her responsibilities has changed, she is simply trying to keep her hide intact.

Question #14: If you don’t prosecute, what with her blatantly admitting to breaking four laws on the Rose Garden, what message will that send to the public?

Answer: We have no power to prosecute, we simply hand over the data to the DOJ for them to prosecute. And we do not have the authority to hand over all of the data because of its sensitivity. And some of the data will lead into other cases of corruption.

Question #15: Pretty sure the judge just said she would follow your recommendation without question today…

Answer: Making a recommendation is not the same as actually prosecuting. We only say, “Here is the data, you need to get XYZ” and then the DOJ acts.

Question #16: Do you ever fear for your life?

Answer: Yes.

Question #17: What are the chances of an indictment before the election?

Answer: Before the Clinton-Lynch meeting, I would have said 0%. Now it looks more likely because the public now sees the Clintons trying to cover their asses. More questions will add pressure for the investigation to continue.

Question #18: Will we really see mass resignations and leaks if nothing happens? Or is it all just bluster and hearsay?

Answer: Foreign powers are in possession of some of the documents we have analyzed, because they were hacked from the Clinton server. Trump has some files as well, and likely plans to leak them and use them to his advantage soon. The leaks will have to be made in a non-transparent fashion.

Question #19: I’m aware, but if you recommend to prosecute, she said she would. If you don’t, public trust will be eroded at this point. Too much is out in the open.

Answer: If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.

Question #20: And what happens when Putin releases all the emails? And all the information he’s dug up from them?

Answer: I am not sure, but some of my war strategy buddies are estimating a high probability that Russia will leak all the info they have out to the world, since Clinton wants to go to war with them and they have no desire to be in conflict with the US.

Question #21: “If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.”

Most people have suspected this for a while.

What do you think will happen if you don’t recommend? Not just at home, but what will other nations do with the information that is already out there?

Answer: If we do not recommend, it will look like a cover-up and Trump will use the perception to bolster his message. I did work in PsyOps once, and Trump’s use of confirmation bias is legendary.

Question #22: Answer this: Is Clinton a commie, yes or no?

Answer: No.

Question #23: How long until we know whether or not you are going to recommend?

Answer: Impossible to determine at this point. We could do it tomorrow if we wanted. There are too many political players involved.

Question #24: What’s the deal with Bill Clinton’s health? Just old age or something else?

Answer: Bill Clinton will likely die this year.

Question #25: So can you give an estimate to let me know when you guys will make your decision? It’s gotta happen soon, because if you don’t prosecute, you are potentially, giving the keys to the white house to the most corrupt politican ever.

Answer: Impossible to say. The entire government is corrupt. No one is clean, not even Trump.

Question #26: In the near future, there will be several books, and a movie by Dinesh D’Souza coming out and they claim they will bring her down with this leaks. Will these have any affect on whether she’s indicted?

Answer: They will only have an effect on public opinion, which will help her get indicted. But I assure you, Dinesh D’Souza has nothing on her. The only person coming close is Jerome Corsi. He is putting the pieces together (loosely).

Question #27: Tell me the dirt on Trump.

Answer: Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.

Question #28: What do you think of this, “Sources say that the investigation will conclude shortly” meme?

Answer: Mainstream media is shit. Who cares what they say. They are attempting to distract by putting the focus on Hillary’s emails and not the Foundation.

Question #29: So why are you hesitating? If you recommend to prosecute, you will at least have the perception of being trustworthy to the US public. If you don’t, a lot of people are going to know the jig is up, and the US has lost all shred of integrity. Ditto for other countries. Why are you guys even debating letting the cancer spread? Why are you considering allowing the corruption to spread to you?

Answer: Your moral inclinations may look good on the internet, but in real life the situation is complicated. You cannot possibly ask the entire government to prosecute itself. Lynch has also given to the Foundation, and has many ties to many people she should not. Remember that Bill appointed her. She is a great prosecutor, but she did not get where she is by simply being good

at her job.

Question #30: How do we fix this? and be we i mean you guys lmao

Answer: We have our hands tied. My message to you and everyone on this board is do not get distracted by Clinton’s e-mails. Focus on the Foundation. All of the nightmarish truth is there. The e-mails will pale in comparison.

Question #31: In Trump’s case, isn’t that just an instance of the hazing/initiation into the elite by providing them with the ability to blackmail him if he goes off reservation?

Answer: I do not know Trump’s record, but from the case he definitely knew to limit his exposure and make it only look like a donation.

Question #32: Would a Trump presidency better for shit like this ? I assume that he would allow you to prosecute her?

Answer: If Trump wins, Hillary will be prosecuted. I have heard rumors Christie will be his AG, and Michael Flynn will be his VP pick.

Question #33: Give a specific example of large scale corruption or collusion.

Answer: Saudi Arabia visits and donations to the Clinton Foundation. Russian Uranium fiasco. Hillary and the Israel lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations. AIPAC. The list is endless.

Question #34: Why bother, then? If you can tell that your boss and your boss’s boss are afraid to do their jobs, what’s the point? Why not half ass it, enjoy a fat government paycheck, and cover your own ass when it inevitably falls apart?

Answer: My bosses have the benefit of being in the limelight. Their disappearances of silences would be accompanied by questions. Mine would not.

Question #35: Stop LARPing and give us something to work with, some good concrete examples.

Answer: I am providing as much as I can.

Question #36: If this isn’t all some fanfiction, then this is a massive bomb that the FBI needs to carefully handle if they choose to recommend to prosecute.

Answer: Correct.

Question #37: How deep is Obama involved in all of this?

Answer: Impeachment-level involved.

Question #38: Does she kill people?

Answer: People have a way of dying around her.

Question #39: Trump has files, what the fuck?

(Another User)

Answer 01: Must be how he’s made so many predictions about Brussels and the like; he has bought special access into what’s really going on with the global war on terror.

FBI Anon’s Answer: Trump has very good people advising and leaking to him.

Question #40: We know. And by not prosecuting, you are giving these countries leverage over the US. This is the option you are discussing when you discuss not prosecuting, and you know it. In order to

not cause an upheaval lasting months or years by cutting out the cancer, you are discussing letting the US die quietly.

(Another User)

Question 40b: Fuck you for not doing your duty to the people, you jaded amoral fucks. You’ve blown what little trust I had left that there were still decent patriots left in the government.

You fuckers are gonna let the biggest, most corrupt cunt take the highest office in the land.

You think that won’t bring this country down? Fuck you. Fuck you. Fuck you.

Answer: I will put it to you this way: You have three choices:

A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs, and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our governent, and

a civil war begins.

B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of the public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.

C) You do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.

I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail.

Question #41: If the FBI doesn’t recommend to indict, what kind of reaction should we expect from within the FBI? Will anyone resign?

Answer: Comey will likely resign in any case. The FBI is being very quiet for a reason, most of us want to keep our jobs.

Question #42: Is Snowden tied up in all this somehow?

Answer: Snowden has nothing to do with any of this.

Question #43: Is this election a clever ploy by Obama to have a VP of his choosing become the president? Indict Hillary, and the VP takes over. And Trump might be a threat to this plan, hence all these


Answer: Possibly. I don’t know for sure.

(with an image with the filename “fbi_playbook_on_hillary.png”)

Question #44: Some autist has already said as much.

(Another User)

Question 44b: How accurate is this copypasta, OP? Spot-on analysis? Or fanfiction-tier?

Answer: Obama and Hillary do hate each other. Hillary hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness. As far as the investigation, some details are correct. As to the outcome, no one


Question #45: How many of us are on the FBI watchlist?

Answer: Truthfully, not many. The FBI is rather fond of /pol/. We study more than we investigate.

Question #46: I still don’t get how snuffing her doesn’t end the existential investigation crisis.

Answer: The problem is with the entire government. Hillary is one component of that government.

Question #47: Dinesh D’souza’s new movie will address the Clinton Foundation. Right?

Answer: Most likely.

Question #48: At bare minimum, you need to do B. If you can’t at least make examples of people, the existence of the FBI is pointless.

Start with the most corrupt, like Clinton (and, I presume Feinstein), and each year, choose 3-5 new people with any level of power to indict. Do this until people start retiring. Don’t RICO the entire federal government. You have the option to do it slowly, so do it slowly.

Answer: But if we do it slowly, people like you will get mad that we are not working fast enough.

Question #49: Can you tell us more about the SAPs and were the classified information sent via those compromised too? Also is Obama tied to Clinton Foundation in any way?

Answer: All I can tell you about the SAPs is that Hillary had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason. Obama is loosely tied to the Clinton Foundation, but much more tied in with the same people who donate to the Clinton Foundation.

Question #50: “A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our governent, and a civil war begins.”

So we can expect them not only fucking around really hard in the middle east but elsewhere too? I assume Obama also has considerable influence on the EU and tries to guide them to war with Russia (or at least Hillary does). How much is George Soros involved in all this?

Answer: Russian borders, Ukraine, everywhere NATO is, the South China Sea, the Phillipines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Africa. Soros is at the heart of all of this.

Question #51: “A) Turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war. The civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our governent, and a civil war begins.”

Sounds good to me. Man the fuck up and let slip the dogs of war. If you’re as deep as you claim to be then you know that this is necessary to clean out the filth in our governments. There are no other options left other than bloodshed. Will you stand by and watch as the world falls into the grips of tyrants? Or will you fight for freedom? Those are the only questions you need to ask yourself at this point.

Answer: If it comes down to it, I would fight. But most of us are of the opinion that Hillary will not be president, and having Trump in office makes our job that much easier. But right now we have to carefully wade through this mud.

Question #52: Why did Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch meet on the plane?

Answer: As I stated before, Bill Clinton likely wanted Loretta Lynch to focus on the email server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation.

Question #53: Could the release of this information cause a civil war in the USA? Leak it. Do it. The day of the rope is nigh.

Answer: Yes.

Question #54: So that means she will try to assassinate Corsi. What happens if she succeeds?

Answer: We will go to war with Russia and possibly China if she wins.

Question #55: I’m not advocating for truth for truth’s sake. Option B is the only acceptable scenario, and it needs to be done so that Trump can sweep in and clear the entire establishment of corruption. That is what you are being given the chance to do. If you fail on this, you doom us to a second Rome. Everyone already knows and suspects option A. The patriots in the deep state need to hang this shit over Washington’s head and force them to do the right thing.

Answer: We are working on option B.

Question #56: What can I do?

Answer: Post about Hillary everywhere you can. Focus on the Clinton Foundation. Do not let her email server be the sole focus of media attention. Follow the Clinton Foundation. Her emails are a small bite compared to the Clinton Foundation.

Question #57: “Mainstream media is shit. Who cares what they say. They are attempting to distract by putting the focus on Hillary’s emails and not the Foundation.”

To be honest, assuming it’s not all a ruse, this would be a good opportunity for us to fire up our Twitters and start asking some hard questions about the Clinton Foundation publicly. The more pressure, the better. The last thing I want is for everhting to go back to normal for these


Answer: You should be doing this immediately.

Question #58: What? /pol/ is liked by the FBI? Elaborate please?

Answer: /pol/ is an amalgamation of minds from various geographic and demographic factions. We study very intensely the ideas which emanate and gain promimence on this board, as well as which ideas other organizations try to promote which ultimately get defeated (JIDF, for example, is highly unsuccessful as making /pol/ pro-Israel). And most of us just enjoy the posts in general. We like to see how close to the truth everyone is. And we occasionally let our true nature slip.

Question #59: Can the FBI pay me to shitpost?

Answer: No.

Question #60: Didn’t Obama push to have the case postponed until 2018 as well?

Answer: There is talk of it. I do not know where the order came from.

Question #61: “Obama and Hillary do hate each other. Hillary hates black people…”

What the fuck man, keep that shit quiet. You’ll gain her votes here by saying that.

Answer: Blacks are violent and generally impulsive, but they are not all bad. And they can be, for lack of a better term domesticated. Thomas Sowell has made note of this.

Question #62: George Soros involved in this?

Answer: He is the kingpin.

Question #63: Any hard evidence Hillary sold weapons and favors from the State Department for cash to our enemies?

Answer: Weapons, favors, intelligence, and people.

(pasted IFTYS.png)

Question #64: “Bill Clinton will likely die this year.”

And here’s why.

Answer: More likely of natural causes.

Question #65: Why not go big? Is Obama actually secretly Osama with his beard shaven?

Answer: Obama is a liberal atheist who is willingly associated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Stephen Coughlin’s book, while not totally accurate, does shine light in the right direction.

Question #66: From what you’re saying, there’s no easy way of actually keeping the lid on this. It sounds like it’s reached too many eyes and ears now, and is only going to reach more. Whether you want it or not, I think you FBI guys need to go full hog on this. We’re talking about the assured death of the republic if you don’t, rather than the maybe-death of it if you do.

Answer: Canada has no business telling us how to run intel. Trudeau makes you all look like fools, and already his intel departments are coming to us for help doing fuck everything.

Question #67: Do you think Trump is a plant by Clinton to try and assure her a victory? Or was that theory all nonsense?

Answer: Trump is not a Clinton plant. He belives they are disgusting animals.

Question #68: What did the Clinton Foundation do? Please elaborate.

Answer: Sold influence, intel, favors, and people to anyone willing to pay.

Question #69: See, and this is the problem with Washington today. You swear to defend the Constitution, which means protecting the liberties that it guarantees the American people. But here the deep

state is, contemplating allowing the outright subversion and corruption of the government because “muh existing order of things”.

If the corruption is as bad as you claim, then the half of these Senators and Congressmen and possibly even the President have subverted American democracy. If they are indeed traitors, then you would have an obligation go take care of it. I don’t care how it’s done. The American military is one of the few I’d trust to transition us until we can elect new leaders.

Answer: If leaking data en mass destroys my country, we betray the country. If we do nothing, we betray the country. I am not disagreeing with you. I am saying the situation is more complicated when you are inside, and you do not have the breadth of info that I have that would make your eyes fall out of your skull if you know what all was going on.

Question #70: Is it time to buy a gun?

Answer: Yes.

Question #71: What does SAP stand for?

Answer: Special Access Programs.

Question #72: Did you just name the Jew?

Answer: The Nose knows.

Question #73: So, given that there is a claimed risk of external and internal war if the intent of the

government treason is revealed, was getting caught part of their plan?

Answer: They are not big guys.

Question #74: With Bernie- around the time Clinton clinched the delegates, he had a meeting with Obama and came out smiling. Anything suspicious about that given what you are privy to?

Answer: Bernie is staying in hoping Clinton will be indicted or forced to recuse herself from the race. We cannot know what will happen atm.

Question #75: Do we have any real reason to believe this person guys? I’ve been lurking and I just want to believe so bad. But it would be so easy for this to be top tier trolling...right?

Answer: If you dig hard into the Clinton Foundation and make it the sole point of your focus, you will remember this thread when the truth is revealed.

Question #76: Why would she drag us to war? In what way does that benefit her? Also, can you post any proof that youre legit?

Answer: It benefits her because her donors have paid for it. I do not want to post any information about me or where I am, because if any hint got out that I posted anything, I would be fired and blacklisted. Possibly killed.

Question #77: What are the chances of you guys not doing option B and just doing option A? Maybe have a redo and flip a coin or something.

Answer: Option A is not going to happen. Maybe if Trump gets elected.

Question #78: What do you know about admiralty law being imposed on the people and the usurpation of common law?

Answer: Not likely to happen. If you remember the post by the red team planner, his analysis was spot-on.

Question #79: “He is the kingpin.”

Then start with the Kingpins. The Clintons and Soros would be enough to let everyone else know that you aren’t fucking around.

Answer: I admire your spirit.

Question #80: “Thomas Sowell”

The faggot that compared Trump to Hitler? I used to respect him before that.

Answer: Sowell has documented that blacks were actually integrating decently into American society before the welfare state began.

Question #81: What’s your guys opinion on meme magic? Kekkism?

How does Obama feel about the recent Chicago scanner threads (thanks for ruining that btw, fun-haters) and the light they shine on his “fair city”?

Answer: I am not religious, so I have no opinion on kek. But meme magic is very real, in the sense that a thought large enough to gain traction with enough minds will manifest in external reality. That’s why confirmation bias works, and why Trump has used it to his advantage.

Question #82: What the fuck is a Special Access Program? A computer program? Or is it like a full nuclear kit thing like in movies? Can you tell us what they do?

Answer: A Special Access Program is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read

on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the globe, or our missile silo locations.

Question #83: Any info on Sid Blumenthal? What is he doing now?

Answer: Blumenthal is attempting to get dirt on and strategize against Trump.

Question #84: Is Soros an ideologue or a profiteer? He seems a bit old to be the latter. What countries are least tainted by corruption in your opinion? Or is it the standard huffpo top 10 lists like Iceland, New Zealand, etc.?

Answer: Ideologue. Believes he and his cohorts are the answer to ending all world wars. Todd Huizinga’s book The New Totalitarian Temptation reveals the mindset quite adequately.

Question #85: Where does Soros stand in all of this?

(Another User)

Answer: Simply put. Soros owns tavistock. Tavistock owns the government.


FBI Anon’s Answer: Soros funds, instructs, and influences every layer of US government. Right down to the tax.

(Second response to the answer who linked the Wikipedia page)

Answer: Someone is on to something.

Question #86: Should I be using Linux or Windows if I am to be making a Twitter account and start digging into the Clinton Foundation? Also, what is with the North American Union that has been proposed by Obama?

Answer: It does not matter, any agency can find any computer working right now. What you have to do is get lost in the noise. Do not do anything out of your ordinary behavior and you will be


Question #87: How do I adequately dig in the Clinton Foundation and help prevent it from being forgotten? I’m about to start googling after I post this comment but I feel like that’s naive.

Answer: Promote and discuss it everywhere. Ask questions. Read the news on it. Post articles everywhere. Pirate Jerome Corsi’s book (so people can’t say I am shilling) because he does have some things right.

Question #88: Is the FBI in this case then entirely pro-Trump, I assume? Does she have every single media outlet in America in her hands? How strong is Angela Merkel involved in all of this? (Or Germany in general.)

Answer: Most of us are pro-Trump. Hillary hates that Trump makes the media profitable, so they have to keep covering him. Germany is not involed. Merkel likes Hillary though.

Question #89: If you guys were able to get Nixon, why not Clinton?

Answer: Nixon wasn’t nearly as reckless.

Question #90: How much does Loretta Lynch know about this? Does she realize that this is much bigger than Hillary, or is she somehow ignorant about the scope of this?

Answer: Lynch has an idea, but if she gets any more info she will have to either recuse herself or prosecute. Remember, if too much information is given it violates national security law and people have to back away.

Question #91: If Bill Clinton dies, will that get Hillary elected? How usual is it to have your own email server in your home?

Answer: If Bill Clinton dies it may help her, but I doubt it. The server makes her look corrupt as fuck.

Question #92: Nah I get you, I’m just signalling the fuck out of this to get people reading to consider alternatives. And what do you mean by “destroy the country”? If you destroy the federal government, state governments will step in to fill the void temporarily until new elections or a Constitutional Convention can be held to lawfully change the form of the federal government.

Yeah, shit will go south for a while. But it won’t be the absolute end of the world.

Answer: Revolutions are much longer and more violent than you think. And if a civil war breaks out, foreign powers will immediately get involved, prolonging any conflict.

Question #93: Do you know about UFOs?

Answer: Yes.

Question #94: In the SAP wiki, the Secretary of State is given access to SAP. So in what way did she break the law?

Answer: Secretary of State CAN have access. That does not mean he/she WILL. SAP is granted on a need to know basis, and Hillary did not have any need to know any of the programs on her


Question #95: Did Hitler escape? Do you get to play with guns and giggle switches? What theory are we right about?

Answer: Hitler: I do not know. I have a normal firearm. Correct theories: Huge Jewish influence, Soros as a puppet master, red team planner. You would have to ask specifically.

Question #96: I’m just a lowly little person who wants to live a simple, happy, and peaceful life in a country I love. Any chance of this happening?

Answer: It is more fun in the game.

Question #97: Are you gonna do another thread dude? Or have you answered pretty much everything you are willing to?

Answer: I am getting tired but I want to drive home my point about the Clinton Foundation. I may start another thread.

Question #98: ...So meme magic is just fucking confirmation bias. Well that really takes the wind out of Kek.

Answer: Perceptions shape reality.

Question #99: “If you dig hard into the Clinton Foundation and make it the sole point of your focus, you will remember this thread when the truth is revealed.”

Any leads on that? Or just Google?

“Not likely to happen. If you remember the post by the red team planner, his analysis was spot-on.”

It happened in 1933, same time the gold was confiscated. It’s why today you see cases like The People of Vermont v. $10,000.

Worth a read.

Answer: Keep pressing for more info on the Clinton Foundation.

Question #100: Hey as long as you’re here, what do you know about Cicada?

Answer: Cicada is a Pentagon program to induct special minds to work on simulations and strategic planning for their models. A model of the entire world is under development there, several prominent economists have worked on it.

Question #101: “Sowell has documented that Blacks were actually integrating decently into American society before the welfare state began.”

I favor repatriation, or the assignment of a state for them. White children need their own countries, just like Asian and Black children have.

Answer: People can integrate if done in a healthy and constructive way. Not by force.

FBI Anon: Second thread for those interested:


Everyone take your questions to the second thread, I won’t be up much longer.

Thread 2

FBI Anon: I am a person with intimate knowledge of the inner workings of the Clinton case. I will answer as many questions as I can without giving too much away.

Original thread: >>79480356

Question #102: So is the government really trying to pass stricter gun laws as a way to control us if shit gets out of hand?

Answer: 100% true.

Question #103: “A Special Access Program is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the glove, or our missile silo locations.”

So how did she get the SAPs out to sell them? I can just imagine that smug cunt waddling out with a USB smiling at every person she sees.

Answer: Someone leaked them to her.

Question #104: How do I get your job?

Answer: Join the FBI, be good, keep secrets.

Question #105: Is the government really trying to disarm us in case shit hits the fan? Also how do I get your job?

Answer: Yes. The government is terrified to do anything out of fear of revolution. As I mentioned, join FBI, be good, keep secrets.

Question #106: I’m pretty ignorant when talking about American politics, but this thread is mesmerizing. FBIanon, how could all of this affect the South American governments? Do they have some dirt

in this too?

Answer: AFAIK, South American governments are not implicated, but we do have operations in Venezuela which would get out of hand quick if leaked.

Question #107: How will this affect the UK? Is Brexit going to be a factor in all of this unravelling?

Answer: It is very likely Britain will remain in the EU.

Question #108: Can you at least post a badge or something? Info makes sense but I am having a hard time believing it, my dubs man.

Answer: At my level, doing so would trigger so many alarms I could not guarantee my future. This way there is plausible deniability. Lost in the crowd.

Question #109: How much is the EU/NATO being pushed towards war with Russia?

Answer: Heavily.

Question #110: What is the likelihood that Hillary will get indicted? What would be the indicators that the indictment is imminent?

Answer: Indicited: depends on if Trump gets elected. Imminent: 0%.

Question #111: What is the goal at large? What do whom actually want? They’re using slime region to destabilize western culture as a whole, but all for what, and why? What are the motives?

Answer: The goal (of Soros, since I assume that is what you are asking) is to create a global government where all people intermingle and breed and become one people ruled by a radically pure Jewish race. They sincerely believe under their rule all human conflict will cease because there will be no more cause for division. This desire is born out of a fear of the horrors of WWII. The Holocaust is a lie, but the death toll was still massive nonetheless. And many people were brutalized by it.

Question #112: Do Russia (or others) have enough info to bring down Clinton if they leaked it? Would they be more likely to leak it or use it for blackmail?

Answer: They have enough to take her down. I am not sure of the totality of what they have. I can tell you that they 100% hacked her server.

Question #113: Is Trump’s wall financially feasible?

Answer: Yes.

Question #114: How big of a risk are you taking posting this to 4chan?

Answer: Enormous, but the risks are mitigated by anonymity and plausible deniability.

Question #115: What nations are untouched by this mass conspiracy? Is Alex Jones a disinfo agent?

Answer: No one is untouched, the US has operations going on around the world in every hole you can think of. Alex Jones is a useful idiot. He does believe what he says, though.

Question #116: In all seriousness why HASN’T Putin leaked anything yet?

Answer: Putin is waiting to see how the DOJ plays it, also how the elections work out. I think if Hillary gets elected and tries to start shit, he will use it as a deterrent against war.

Question #117: The picture you’ve painted about the extent of government corruption is incredibly bleak. Have you lost faith in democracy? Also, I’m a recent college grad who hasn’t gotten a job yet.

Should I even bother trying to be a functional member of such a corrupt society? Why not just lock myself in my room and become a NEET?

Answer: We do not live in a democracy, we live in a republic. The is a lot of greatness in America, and there is still plenty to love. Society and culture are dependent on man. You are in control of society, not the other way around.

Question #118: Okay, Mr. RP. Will you push far enough to keep Hillary Clinton out of office?

Answer: I do what I can.

Question #119: Are the incidents manufactured with the intent of harsher gun control laws?

Answer: Yes. The gay bar attacks were inside jobs.

Question #120: Tell us about the ayys.

Answer: Life exists elsewhere in the galaxy, that is all I will say about that.

Question #121: What is your view of the Libertarian Party during this cycle? Viable threat to the duopoly or just delusions of grandeur?

Answer: Good way to shut down the Democratic party. In general Libertarians are just loony.

Question #122: How likely is it that she will be brought up for indictment?

Answer: Likely if Trump gets elected.

Question #123: Are the people leading the investigation blackmailed pedophiles?

Answer: No. The people under the magnifying glass do have an affinity for children.

Question #124: Give us something significant that will happen in the next few days so that we know you are telling the truth.

Answer: I cannot predict the future. I am a high-level analyst and strategist, nothing more.

Question #125: “People can integrate if done in a healthy and constructive way. Not by force.”

A dollup of shit in a tub of ice cream don’t improve the ice cream much, but it sure improves the shit. I’m surprised you aren’t familiar with “regression to the mean”, both high and low genetic outliers tend to have offspring closer to their racial average in IQ, temperaent, foresight, etc. How does it help us to lower average IQ levels?

Answer: I am well aware of the science and what I am telling your cunt British ass is in small doses, other races can integrate and assimilate into other cultures. Not by mass immigration. Small doses of highly intelligent people can fit very well into a foreign society.

Question #126: How crooked is Loretta Lynch the affirmative actiona sheboon? Will she save Hillary’s fat butt?

Answer: She is covering her own ass.

Question #127: This may be a silly question if you’re legit, but who do you suport for the election in November? Do you think Donald Trump is a good candidate?

Answer: I support Trump. He is a good candidate. Not perfect, but good. I used to work in PsyOps, and Trump’s campaign is exactly how the textbooks train. It will be studied by agents forever.

Question #128: Will people be so insanely butthurt from the files if they are released that people people will arm themselves?

Answer: If the files are released.

FBI Anon: Responses are going too fast and I am getting tired so if answers are too short, you know why.

Question #129: What’s the deal with the fucking social justice psychos and why do they get so much attention in the media?

Answer: SJWs are an attempt to demoralize the populace into accepting racial impurity and

bastardization and deference to authority. All liberalism is born of low self-esteem.

Question #130: Did Hillary or her allies set up the Orlando shooting? Omar Mateen was with her after all.

Answer: Shooting was CIA.

Question #131: Why does she misspell Obama’s name in all her emails?

Answer: Hillary is honestly a reckless idiot.

Question #132: Since you should have your ear to the ground, is the right really rising? I know people everywhere are getting sick of the bullshit.

Answer: Nationalism is a cultural trend globally.

Question #133: What are all the charges as of now that she could possibly be indicted for?

Answer: Treason of every kind, multiple violations of the Constitution and the Espionage Act.

Question #134: I’ve been reading the questions and answers here and am so far impressed. I know some people with high level security clearance that have said similar things to what you’re saying. However a few things are slightly different. I’ve also looked into this and am quite appalled by some of the documents I’ve seen. That aside, I have a couple of questions.

In regards to the Clinton Foundation, what would happen if all of this information ended up being released to the general public? As in, what would happen if all the Clinton Foundation secret records were released publically?

Answer: I said that in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what, and no one has yet asked about all the human trafficking bits I have been laying out.

Question #135: What if you, you personally, leaked all the documents to the darkweb or some other online outlet. What would happen?

Answer: Silencing and/or death. Some places are trying to leak but we censor them too fast.

Question #136: Would the countries that would be named in the documentation declare war if there was a large change in government?

Answer: No, they would declare war because all our secret operations in their countries would be exposed.

Question #137: Couldn’t you have the AGs of some of the right aligned states indict her if they were given enough information and documentation?

Answer: We have thought about this. It is on the table

Question #138: I assume most people in the FBI are Republicans, yes? I mean, I can’t imagine too man leftists joining the FBI. It seems very much out of the hippy dippy leftwing horseshit they like.

So...if that’s the case, why don’t you fuckers just leak the goods and take Clinton down through the backdoor?

Answer: Yes. We do our jobs, not what we want.

Question #139: If the FBI knows so much about Jewish influence on lawmaking then is there any effort to counter it? Or is it just a feeling of “whatever, the people voted for this guy who signed off on it anyway”?

Answer: Not everyone knows. Information is compartmentalized. I am a "big picture" guy. I don’t even have all the info but I see more than most.

Question #140: Please elaborate on how the Holocaust is a lie.

Answer: You already know, population records do not support systematic slaughter of Jews.

Question #141: Tell me, what is Singapore’s role? Are we the battleground or will the US government coerce us against China?

Answer: If there is a war, it will be fought over the plains of Africa. Singapore has no connection to my knowledge.

Question #142: “The Holocaust is a lie”

Is this common knowledge in the FBI?

Answer: It is at the top.

Question #143: What do you know about 9/11? Was it an inside job?

Answer: 9/11 was Mossad.

Question #144: Give me a sentence or two about what you know about data compression/where it’s going.

Answer: Data compression can mean many things, be more specific.

Question #145: How can we keep a war or more importantly a world government from happening? This sounds like some dystopian movie but I believe you in this case since Jews hate multiculturalism and love it for other countries.

Answer: Buy more guns and get smarter about civil war.

Question #146: I’ve got a question for ya, OP. How bad could this actually get? You’ve mentioned fear of war and revolution. Is there any possibility that Russia or China could fuck us in the fallout?

Answer: If a civil war broke out, 100% certainty that China and Russia would get involved.

Question #147: Also, what fears would need to be resolved in order for the FBI to be willing to go nuclear on this bitch and the Clinton Foundation?

Answer: This would be like launching a nuke at NYC. We would hit the target, but we would then be at war with the whole US. The FBI is facing the entire federal government in this case. It is why we are so quiet.

Question #148: What did Ambassador Stevens know or was going to tell that got him Killaried?

Answer: Weapons smuggling to Libyan “rebels”.

Question #149: “It is very likely Britain will remain in the EU”

The fuck are you talking about? They’re obviously going to keep it out as a warning to other fence sitters: if you leave, you’re gone for good.

 “The goal (of Soros, since I assume that is what you are asking) is to create a global

government where all people intermingle and breed and become one people ruled by a radically pure Jewish race. They sincerely believe under their rule all human conflict will cease because there will be no more cause for division. This desire is born out of a fear of the horrors of WWII. The Holocaust is a lie, but the death toll was still massive nonetheless. And many people were brutalized by it.”

Here we fucking go. So much for feigned legitimacy.

Answer: Deals are being made to be in the EU without being "in" the EU. Backpedalling is running rampant right now, the new conservatives are just as pro-EU as the left. It is why they barred Farage from negotiating with the EU.

Question #150: When did this widespread corruption start? My history teacher said the Romans didn’t know they lost their republic until 100 years after it was gone. How long has it been for us?

Answer: Average age of any empire is 250 years. They all end the same way.

Question #151: Anyways, so Soros, a Nazi collaborator. His ideology is basically Nazism, but with Jews instead of Aryans. Do I have this correct?

Answer: Effectively.

Question #152: Is there any evidence of the Clinton machine having 20-40 people murdered? I can’t find the picture.

Answer: Plenty. Dig deep.

Question #153: Why on earth would they want a war with Russia? It still has nuclear weapons to blow the US up ten times. Are they banking on Putin being too scared to use them?

Answer: Russia is a threat. Highly nationalistic and too white. Loxism is a real thing. Putin is a terrifying figure. Jews are already attempting to get friendly with him, but he isn’t buying. No one really likes Israel.

Question #154: OP, in your opinion and the sentiment within the FBI and government:

How many more years do we have left until the political divide reaches a tipping point and bullets start flying? The mass shootings are indicative of societal decay and pessimism within sentiment.

Answer: Soon. Jesse Williams’ statements are fed to him, and he will likely be a major figure in sewing division.

Question #155: You mentioned in the thread before that Hillary is reckless. Could you elaborate on that?

Answer: She doe not care for the details. She simply likes to have everyone do everything for her, L while she does nothing but get money.

Question #156: OP, please don’t ignore me. I know Singapore is a hotspot for espionage and an intelligence hub concerning China, regional Jihadist elements and others. My question is, what is our role in US plan and will we cooperate with you against our neighbors and CHina or do we maintain neutrality?

Answer: Apologies, I cannot keep up with the thread and I am very tired. Singapore is not implicated to my knowledge. My strategy buddies believe Singapore will be loyal to US.

Question #157: Since you’re dating Soros is the kingpin: He’s saying the EU will now inevitably fall. How likely is that, since he has so much invested in its success?

Answer: Soros is senile. Nothing he says is of value.

Question #158: You said the US/NATO are pushing heavily for a war against Russia. What the fuck do they hope to accomplish by that?

Answer: Soros.

Question #158: Do you think it’s better for Trump if she doesn’t get indicted, because she arguably has more flaws than an alternative Democrat like Bernie?

(p.s. I fucking hate both of them, just for the record.)

Answer: Yes. Trump will (hopefully) obliterate her. She is more thin-skinned than he is.

Question #160: “We do not live in a democracy, we live in a republic.”

A republic IS a democracy. Checkmate, gaythiest.

“Small doses of highly intelligent people can fit very well into a foreign society.”

I’m just so upset by these poor people who we have oppressed and racismed so much, it is our DUTY to return them to their ancestral homelands where they will be free of our disgusting prejudicial pernicious racism.

They would also control the high technology military, now with robots. Also, they might need overt control, just access to the leaders to let the populace feel they are in charge whilst really they are being controlled.

“How likely is that, since he has so much invested in his success?”

It’s even easier to profit from panic selling than ordinary buying. Also, it’s pretty obvious that the bailout money is almost gone, with several states looking like the need it, and major German and Italian banks giving a death rattle.

Answer: Deporting all blacks would be a great thing.

Question #161: Wait, was Libya a smokescreen to get the SAP that Clinton sold to the hands of the buyer?

Answer: Libya was an arms operation in conjunction with the CIA/DOD to give arms to the “rebels”. We didn’t deploy troops because we would have gone to war.

Question #162: Is there hope that I’ll be able to live a nice long happy life and start a family here in the Commonwealth of Virginia?

Answer: Yes.

Question #163: “Indicted: depends on if Trump gets elected. Imminent: 0%.”

What do you mean by this? That the FBI intends to bury the investigation prior to the election?

Answer: Looks that way so far. It is a tough situation.

Question #164: If what you’re posting is true and our government is really Illuminati Lite, won’t they be monitoring what you post here and rub you out later?

Answer: Plausible deniability.

Question #165: So are you saying that your affiliated agency does not see any conflict with China and its neighbors especially with Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, and several ASEAN nations? I’m quite flabbergasted that your priority isn’t containing Chinese intelligence inflitration or hacking.

Answer: My main area of expertise is war games on the Russian front, when I did more strategy than high intel. My buddies know more about the China situation. I just know the South China Sea situation is rough.

Question #166: Joining the military at this time; good or bad?

Answer: Depends on who is elected next.

Question #167: You’ve said two things so far: human trafficking and looking into the Clinton Foundation… Is that a hint to the starting point of our own research?

Answer: Everything I have said is a hint.

Question #168: “Data compression can mean many things, be more specific.”

Data is increasing exponentially. What exactly are your methods for collecting, compressing it, and analyzing it? What companies are at the forefront of this? I know the answer, by the way.

Answer: *asking me to detail data collection methods*

Oracle, LexusNexus, and most recently Micron are all getting into big data work with us.

Question #169: What do you know about Farage? Is he sincere? Is he as good as /pol/ thinks?

Answer: Farage is a genuine person.

Question #170: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about Israel wanting to great Greater Israel?

Answer: Yes.

Question #171: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about white genocide?

Answer: Yes.

Question #172: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about the Holocaust being a lie?

Answer: No.

Question #173: Is there any proof in the Clinton Foundation leaks about "Michelle" Obama being a man?

Answer: Michelle is a woman.

Question #174: Do members of Congress own strip clubs and when they visit, have their own sex slaves?

Answer: Jeffrey Epstein.

Question #175: Would it be a good idea for me to work at the CIA, even if I’m posting here?

Answer: Even better on a resume.

Question #176: What would Russia or the chinks hope to do in the USA? Instill communism? Russian puppet? They would have a real fun time cleaning up the mess of the civil war along with the massive insurgency.

Answer: They want to avoid conflict. But in a civil war, they want to make sure the strongest power is friendly with them.

Question #177: Last thread, you said, “Truthfully, not many. The FBI is rather fond of /pol/. We study more than we investigate.” Is it because /pol/ is always right?

Answer: Yes.

Question #178: Has /pol/ (any of them) found out about anything that the FBI had thought was kept secret and wouldn’t be found out, then /pol/ happened?

Answer: No.

Question #179: Has /pol/ ever found out anything that the FBI didn’t know before the FBI did?

Answer: Yes.

Question #180: Why was JFK assassinated?

Answer: Messing with the banking elite.

Question #181: “I said in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what, and no one has yet asked about the human trafficking bits I have been laying out.”

Okay. Do tell. What about the human trafficking? I assume that those who can be indicted are involved.

Answer: Pedophiles are sex traffickers everywhere. Many polticians trade girls like cattle.

Question #182: Are the US elections rigged? Will Hillary try to rig this one?

Answer: Yes. It is amazing Trump won primaries.

Question #183: Is plausible deniability the reason why you have brought up things that would get us instadiscredited if we tried to bring up this conversation as a source? I mean, even if we humor your argument that aliens are real and the Jews are trying to dominate the world, it won’t be accepted by the public as credible no matter how much truth about the Clinton Foundation you intermingle with it. This is a protective strategy, I presume?

Answer: I said life exists elsewhere. Some people chose to interpret that as aliens. My protective strategy is posting outrageous claims on /pol/ with no evidence, which is standard protocol and raises no alarms. “Fake and gay,” just remember.

Question #184: Refugee crisis: orchestrated or not? Is it better to opt out of a V4 state or South America or will it be possible to live safe in a western European country for the next decades? Is Merkel retarded or involved?

Answer: Orchestrated. Elites need serf populations to work for cheap and breed out whites.

Question #185: Oh I wanted to ask you if Bill Clinton is a pedophile that blows babies. You know anything about that?

Answer: Bill Clinton is a confirmed pedophile.

Question #186: What can Canadians do to help? I’m in no position to join the RCMP or CSIS, in relation to your “Join the FBI” advice.

Answer: Get rid of Trudeau. He has no experience managing or running a country. Fucking leafs.

Question #187: Is there anything else one can do for the future besides vote Trump and try to uphold virtue, our nation’s principles, and culture? Will Europe become a meatgrinder in a war against Islam?

Answer: This is really iffy territory for me. Strategy works by having multiple games running at the same time, assessing the realistic probabilities of each scenario, and acting accordingly. If one plan fails, another acts. In my previous jobs I worked with Russian war games, but I did not do much with the Eurozone. But my buddy told me once that Europe will experience a cultural backlash, which, unless they manage to violently oust Islam which will require a great force, local whites will flee to the US.

Question #188: Please, before you sleep, speak a little on the child prostitution ring.

Answer: Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primary in British parliament and Saudia Arabia, and that’s why Hillary and Bill love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money. Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you.

Question #189: I’ve been here since the fucking beginning. If he wants to tell a story then tell a story. This is just some faggot who loves attention with none of the correct verbiage. His claims are made with ignorant language, and when things get technical, he ad homs and gets mad at people for asking technical questions.

Answer: *verbage

Question #190: What’s the deal with messing Mexico’s shit up? Is it voter manipulation, or is it another reason?

Answer: Mexico is actively trying to undermine the US.

Question #191: Do you have access to when a new media false flag occurs and if yes, could you give us a hint? (Country, month, purpose)

Answer: Watch the conventions carefully.

Question #192: Will the US and Israel eventually turn on the Saudis and nuke them into oblivion?

Answer: More like the Israelis + Saudis = US gets nuked.

Question #193: Do you know what Russia’s ambitions are towards eastern Europe? As in, what they might try to pull next? Do you know of any effort to create a Euro Maidan kind of situation/revolution in Poland like they did in Ukraine?

Answer: Russia wants Ukraine back, and then they want to be left the fuck alone to invest. Russia is more a paragon of freedom and nationalism than any other country.

Question #194: Who has more CP, the FBI or CIA? Is CP a big deal in the highest level of officials in world governments?

Answer: CIA is huge.

Final Post: It is 4:20 here guys, and I am tired as fuck. I enjoyed giving you all what I could. If there is anything to gain from this, it is FOCUS ON THE CLINTON FOUNDATION. The media will over the next few weeks try to paint the email scandal as the only scandal, and Hillary may or may not get indicted. But if you keep pressing the Clinton Foundation and do not let the questions or demands die, then the truth will come out.

Follow the Foundation.

After that, FBI Anon entered the realm of /pol/’s history books. It was yet another infamous entity who’d be etched into the history books of one of the Internet’s most controversial websites. Though at the same time, it faded into obscurity. While Donald Trump went on to win the 2016 election in what has become arguably the greatest political upset in American history, FBI Anon’s legacy was never one on the scale of many of 4Chan’s much more notorious visitors (such as the infamous 4Chan Serial Killer or Grenade Anon—the person who played around with a grenade they found before it subsequently exploded).

However, this story is far from over. While the story faded into obscurity, some ardent truth seekers took the claims made by FBI Anon very seriously. Some videos were made analyzing what was said and some even speculated on who it was, though no definitive answer[s] ever came of this. In the end, it was all speculation. Some did point to Trump’s decision to appoint General Michael T. Flynn as the National Security proof of FBI Anon’s legitimacy, but that’s, once more, speculation—especially since Mike Pence--the former governor of Indiana—was his Vice Presidential choice.

Because of this, the legend of FBI Anon came to a close… for a few months. You see, on April 26, 2017, it was claimed that the fed-turned-anon supposedly returned to 4Chan to host a third AMA. Here it is in its entirety. All credit for the organization of the questions and answers goes to u/hoeskioeh, who posted this on Reddit. Anyways, let’s see what our intrepid FBI agent had to say.

Thread 3

It’s Been a While /pol/

But The Time is Right. FBI Anon Here. You know how this works AMA

Question #195: Is anything actually going to happen with NK

Answer: Yes. At this point the wheels have already been sent in motion for a long time.

Question #196: are we going to war with korea

Answer: Unless Trump decides to bite the establishment which now has him by the collar, yes.

Question #197: Prove it!

Answer: Fake and gay for plausible deniability. But you knew that all ready right?

Question #198: Where’s the safest place to be in the US if shit pops off? stay safe

Answer: At home. Away from populated city centers and urban areas. Most of the elite hold residence in other countries so they will be far from the carnage they create.

Question #199: Is it true that the letter agencies are molding, manipulating and for lack of a better word “building” the way that we think? To expand a little. I’ve heard thrown around a lot that the deep state is actively using the internet to program the way people think via psyops and “shilling”. While this isn’t something we didn’t already know I feel like it goes deeper. Like the deep state is playing a game with reality and is trying to stack the deck in their favor.

Answer: It goes much deeper then you think. Image boards and other places of “free talk” are heavily controlled. Narrative often scripted and pulled away from topics critical of there goal. The other main image board is a known limited hangout

Question #200: When is revolt against Comey ? When is Hillary Jailed ?

Answer: Hillary will never see a jail cell unless a revolution takes place. At one point there was a real chance, since then deep state has retained their grasp of Trump

Question #201: Is this the real alien pic? If not can you post the real one?

Answer: Very Fake, but expect these kind of psyops from project blue beam. Most of the elite are literally insane and expect the public will believe everything. Motions are already in place

Question #202: Wtf is with the cards , more detailz plz

Answer: Can’t say everything. Like always you have to read between the lines

Question #203: What’s happening in the Kuril islands straights? I overheard my line manager at work mention them, she’d have no reason to if not a happening due to my line of work. If it really is you and not some faggot larper, give us the lowdown on /pol/ related items, like pizzagate. Also, post your badge and I’ll post mine - t. work closely with UK defence minister in whitehall.

Answer: Not gonna happen buddy

Question #204: Does the (((deep state))) have dirt on Trump?

Answer: Not directly but through his kids they have him. Kushner is bad news. Him and Ivanka are full blown globalist and on board the NWO plan. This extends to satanic and occult practices. Him purchasing 666 building is no coincidence. Expect to hear more from him as time goes by. Man behind the curtain

Question #205: Are there internal struggles going on inside and between the intelligence agencies? How bad are they?

Answer: Most of the agents love their country and want to see it do well but the NWO does not want that. Like alway as you go up the ladder the stench increases.

Question #206: Whats wtih project Gotham Shield and the Minuteman launch? this all seems to be planned at just the wrong time.

Answer: Another False flag to get us into war with NK. Drill goes on for weeks. Don’t fall for the only today meme. Where’s there’s smoke and crisis actors you got fire

Question #207: Is there anything we can do to stop WW3 from happening? Or is it set in stone now?

Answer: Yes. Keep pushing and investigating. This is a long game and they will not rest until every country is under their control. Places like this legit make them scared

Question #208: Unless Trump decides to bite the establishment which now has him by the collar, yes. Have him by the collar how? Any particular groups?

Answer: Bill Kristol, deep state, Soros. Different players but they always play for the same team. Virtually all the leaks in the white house were coming from Priebus. That graduated into Kushner covertly giving dirt(sex tape) to deep state. In the family circle he has such pull they do not suspect him

Question #209: Have you been to Antarctica?

Answer: Never been. But it’s a great vacation spot, and not because of the weather

Question #210: Why come back now? What is NK going to distract us from? what tech should I invest in?

Answer: To let you know to keep pushing. /pol/ really does have the power to change the world. NK is meant encircle Russia.That has always been NWO’s goal and hasn’t changed

Question #211: Should i be stocking up on water and ammo

Answer: Yes. Not a religious man myself but for what the elite are into a bible wouldn’t be a bad pick either.

Question #212: Is Trey Gowdy currently in protective custody? Was he actually picked to be the next FBI director?

Answer: Can’t comment on that right now.

Question #213: What does the deep state have on Trump to control him? Trump made some remarks that made it sound like he plans on taking down Epstein, is that whole plan finished with? Also what’s the likelihood that NK has nukes on its satellites and is planning on an EMP launch?

Answer: Trump literally has his whole cabinet working against him. Kushner is an Israeli operative as well as Powell. They are not playing for the home team. Kushner controls Trump and the narrative through his daughter, his reddit and 4X2 bots, and more nefarious blackmail. Look into Cadre’s dealings. It’s a good start. NK would never attack unprovoked. It would be game over for them. The media is building up their arsenal so people buy the upcoming false flag like they did in Syria

Question #214: Is there any kind of development of investigation into pizzagate or paedophile rings and when can we expect to see something from this? You mentioned a possible revolution might help see Clinton behind bars but what with trey gowdy having missing investigators can we expect to see something happen in this corner and perhaps show the MSM as fools once more?

Answer: Until pressure to remove Kushner and Ivanka’s appointments from the cabinet began nothing will happen on this front. Removing Kushner is the only way the ship straights itself peacefully and is the start to solving these problems.

Question #215: Simple question will the wall be built? Trump made a lot of promises and this one will crumble him down.

Answer: As things stand now no. Trump always intended to build it but the wall is a huge thorn in the plan for open borders. The republican establishment and liberals will not go along with any plans to build it. Most of his entire cabinet now openly oppose him on it. Bannon and Mnuchin are the only two left on his side

Question #216: In the family circle he has such pull they do not suspect him So basically Trump runs his business and became president because Kushner wanted it so? And he is a puppet for his daughter and his son-in-law? God thats disgusting and humiliating.

Answer: Kushner runs all of the campaigns online interests. That has turned into him controlling these so that Trump sees his narrative. Trump trusts him too much to see the knife

Question #217: Never been. But it’s a great vacation spot, and not because of the weather. is that where NWO Headquarters is?

Answer: Getting close

Question #218: Thanks for the encouraging. What do you think about Venezuela, is there any plans to intervene, or the CIA just decided to play fair all of the sudden?

Answer: CIA has been intervening there already for a very long time.

Question #219: Can you give us a hint of how many people in congress are pedofiles?

Answer: Probably 75-85% engage in either children or men. Blackmailed through both.

Question #220: To what degree is the alt-Right being monitored by the FBI? Are they worried about it?

Answer: Most of the alt-right sites are straight up honeypots or used for misdirection.

Question #221: NK would never attack unprovoked. It would be game over for them. The media is building up their arsenal so people buy the upcoming false flag like they did in Syria I get this narative so why are they not using this unspent capitol from today to use it as a false flag? Was it because people noticed? It seems like a perfect change to put us on the course to war with NK with no objections.

Answer: Don’t count em out yet. Preparations are already in place. Drills run all week

Question #222: What is the Mormon / FBI role in ’ The Great Work’ When does Alex Jones give up his NWO shilling ?

Answer: Jones is Jones. He’s aware of the jewish question but can’t talk about it without losing money. He’s about 65% right on other things. Do your own digging

Question #223: how can /pol change the world? /pol has exposed so much. Still, nothing happens

Answer: There was a joke over here a couple weeks ago how /pol/ mad Cadre change their free mason logo. It was funny because it was true

Question #224: How close am I?

>US false flags a nuke

>Benevolent alien holographs save the day

>we worship aliens now

Answer: Close. Not there yet but close. There were some posters here very close to Kushner’s ties to project blue beam. looking into what lucent became is the next step

Question #225: what did (((they))) do to put trump on a leash?

Answer: Ivanka.

Question #226: which place on this planet would you say is the safest if all hell broke loose? e.g. Greenland or some remote islands in the pacific

Answer: The elite literally have steel castles underground. You can never match that. By exposing them you become stronger.

Question #227: Is Spencer and his fags over at The Shoah honeypots? I feel like they’re controlled opposition t b h

Answer: Yes. Most of these alt-right places are honey pots. Expose the truth everywhere. That other image board is on Cadre’s payroll

Question #228: If Antarctica is not NWO Headquarters then it must be the biggest sex tourism, pedo-island of them all. Closer?

Answer: Trans-humanism experiments is closer.

After this thread, the trail on FBI Anon goes cold. I’ve heard claims that [s]he popped up on the now defunct image board 8chan, but I’ve never been able to confirm this. Given that 8chan is now defunct and I don’t know if there’s an archive, I’m going to hazard a guess and say that there’s no trace of the AMA there. Also, doing a Bing search yields results for QAnon and not FBI Anon.

It’s because of that lack of information that, as it stands, our story comes to an end. Yeah, I know, it’s a less-than climactic conclusion. I wish there was more that I could provide, but beyond your typical claims that they were somewhere, I cannot find anything to point me in a direction worth traversing down. So instead, let’s head into the next part of this story.

The Progenitor For QAnon?

There’s a theory out there that FBI Anon and QAnon are either one-in-the-same or that the former inspired the latter. If you’re familiar with Q, I doubt I need to even explain why, but for those that don’t: I want to take a moment to go over why.

Ignoring the recent controversy (or, well, the ongoing controversy) surrounding Q first posted on October 28, 2017 on 4Chan’s /pol/ board. Nowadays, they (it’s commonly believed that Q is a group of people) reside on 8kun. It’s there that Q conveys information in riddles of sorts to “patriots” (I use quotation marks because that’s what followers are referred to as) to decipher/decode. Here are some examples. First up, this enigmatic message:

There is 'Q'. 1

There are 'Anons'. 2

There is no 'Qanon'. 3

Media labeling as 'Qanon' is a method [deliberate] to combine [attach] 'Q' to comments _theories _suggestions _statements [and ACTIONS] made by 2.



Not all 'Anons' are authentic [injected].

You are correct, CJ.

Retweet @ 17:17 had meaning. [mathematical probability _17:17 [day after]?]

Do you believe it was a coincidence surgical removal of You Tube accounts occurred same day as 'Hunter' drop?

Welcome to the Digital Battlefield.


Cryptic. Moving on though, here is our second example.

Ukraine, China, Iraq, Iran, …… opens the door far beyond the BIDEN family.

How do you protect your interests [shelter from prosecution _public awareness]?

Control [infiltrate] DOJ, FBI, State, Intel, News, ……..?

How many *fired* FBI [Russia _Midyear] received a book deal?

Book deals can be lucrative.

Follow the family.

US taxpayer(s) paid for it all.



Now for the third example.

How do you inform your target(s) ['business partners'] what you have?

Why would H. Biden have such material on his laptop?

How was the content *originally* received?


Why would H. Biden risk turning over such material to a computer repair shop? [contents unrestricted?]

On purpose [years of being treated poorly by 'Pop'] or simple negligence?

If such information existed on laptop why wouldn't contents be claimed?

Several attempts made to contact to claim?

Messages left?

Why wouldn't H. Biden want to reclaim *knowing* the contents on the drive could bury *Pops* & family.

A troubled life?

A troubled family?

Looks can be deceiving.


The similarities between FBI Anon and Q mostly come in the form of being a government insider and predictions/urges to do self research. The speculation on the two being the same person/persons is a bit more complex, but easy to break down. It primarily states that Q spawned from FBI Anon because of a desire to drum up some controversy and that, using the basic layout of the FBI Anon Q&A, but with a coat of vague paint, Q was birthed.

It’s not going to make much sense when my lazy ass tries to explain it. Sorry, but I’m adamant about this. The concept in which this claim hitches on is something I’m absolutely dreadful at explaining because inspiration is something that I’m atrocious at trying to convey. The simplest way I can put it is that FBI Anon led to Q because of the popularity, but changes were made to enforce a lot more plausible deniability.

So yeah. Some people out there believe this theory while others don’t. It’s ultimately something nobody can really prove without an outright confession, but I’ll leave it up to you. Yeah, this was a very short section, but I thought it was simply worth mentioning. So without further ado, let’s move onto the theories.


1. It was a real FBI agent

Kicking things off, our first theory posits that a real life fed was fed posting on 4Chan before fed posting was a thing. Memeception, guys and girls! That or this has turned into that movie Tenet.  Did anyone see that movie? I personally didn’t. It looked kinda meh.

Ah well, whatever. This theory is as it advertises on the surveillance van outside of your home: FBI Anon was legit. As for why things didn’t come true, it’s likely because Trump managed to subvert them or the Deep State fought back as hard as it could to prevent Trump from winning. Either way, the theory is the one that most truth seekers buy into.

Now for the million dollar question: is there any evidence for this theory? That’s very difficult to answer because it dives into a plethora of other conspiracy theories. While I’d love to elaborate on this, I would be here for a very long time. If you want to read more about this, I would recommend you look into the story/stories of QAnon or simply do your own research on the Deep State. For now, on this blog, all I can say is that we’ll get to that story someday soon.

2. It was a LARP

Our second theory is that the entire thing was a LARP (or: Live Action Role-Play). It’s basically masquerading as someone you aren’t. For example, I LARP as a writer as a human.

Ahem. Well, anyways: LARPers on 4Chan—especially on /pol/—are by no means anything new. There have been people who claim to be CIA agents, government insiders, film producers/studio employees, game developers, aliens, gang members, Chads, and many other things. 4Chan is a place where you can be whoever you want and someone is going to play along. In the case of FBI Anon, the precedent is there for it to be a LARP and I would say that it’s the safest bet in the way of theories. As for evidence: I think the precedent alone qualifies, but I’ll acknowledge that doesn’t technically qualify as evidence and would also make me a terrible lawyer.

3. It was a troll

Rounding things out, the third and final theory is that the entire thing was done to troll /pol/ and some ardent truth seekers fell for the bait. Oof, tough break. Oh well, F’s in chat, boys and girls.

Trolls and 4Chan go together like bread and butter. The website is notorious for having trolls who do anything and everything for a laugh. Whether it’s making swastikas in video games, stealing Shia LaBeouf’s flag, or saying that the pool is closed due to AIDS, you can count on 4Chan to do something ridiculous.

However, pranks and trolls pulled on random folks isn’t the extent of their influence. Sometimes, the hacker known as Four Chin will prank himself by having a clone take up the mantle of being Four Chin. After that, he will be pranked and keks will be had. Or, in simpler terms: 4Chan users will prank/troll each other by masquerading as someone else. Low effort bait, high quality bait, whatever. The site's anonymity allows users to screw with each other to their heart's content. Just don’t expect jannies to take kindly to it.

My Take

The tale of FBI Anon is one that I’ve debated as being legitimate or not; mostly to entertain the idea of a large-scale government conspiracy. Sure, I have some beliefs that the average John or Jane would no doubt find really strange. Though at the end of the day, I think they’re within the realm of acceptable given I’m not out on the street corner ranting about how Barack Obama is going to break into your child’s room and eat his or her heart and then dance around with her intestines before flying back to his mothership.

My bizarre hyperbole aside, I believe that FBI Anon was nothing more than a LARP; a really bored person who wanted to drum up some controversy to leave an impression during a tense election cycle. My reasoning for this, besides a lack of anything he said having come true, is probably not going to be popular among many truth seekers; it’s 4Chan. Almost everything said there isn’t true. It’s generally the ramblings of either a lunatic or someone who’s bored who wants to have fun and people either take the bait or play along.

Now, to play the devil’s advocate: it is true that the FBI monitors the site, along with 8chan/8kun. You can do a quick Google search of “fed posting” and find that this is in fact true. Though the writing style of an actual FBI agent and FBI Anon doesn’t really match up. At least, to me. While yes, everyone has their own style, I don’t think that years of training would wear off that quickly when you’re presumably at work. I also don’t think the FBI would be so callous as to make sure their agents weren’t revealing government secrets on an image board.

“Huh, Rick is talking about how Director Comey is an idiot. That’s against the rules. Well shoot, better just ignore that and go back to wasting resources and pretending we’re doing our jobs.”

The thought of that occurring—regardless if you think the Bureau is worth a dime or not—doesn’t really add up to me. It seems to contradict itself in how the Bureau can be both a shadowy agency that pulls the strings and is incompetent and incapable of supporting its own weight.

One other thing of note—and this is something that I know mostly from hearsay—is that the FBI and CIA don’t get along. The reason I point this out is because, during the Q&A, FBI Anon had this to say:

Question #175: Would it be a good idea for me to work at the CIA, even if I’m posting here?

Answer: Even better on a resume.

Yet, this is also stated:

Question #194: Who has more CP, the FBI or CIA? Is CP a big deal in the highest level of officials in world governments?

Answer: CIA is huge.

Okay, that’s bizarre, but I’ll hazard a guess and say that the fact you have the CIA on your resume is really good. Though that brings me to something I personally find a bit weird: the fact FBI Anon would speakly even remotely well of the CIA, Let me be clear: I know that FBI Anon criticizes the CIA in the Q&A. However, the question there strikes me as mystifying, so let me go on a brief tangent so I at least have this out of my mind.

Historically, the FBI and CIA loathe each other—and that’s being kind. It’s been said that, while special agents in the FBI greatly admired and loved Robert Mueller’s leadership, they weren’t happy that he wasn’t more willing to prosecute CIA agents for what they did. There was also the matter of how the CIA wouldn’t cooperate with the FBI prior to the 9/11 Terrorist Attacks; the CIA wasn’t willing to share intel that could have potentially prevented the attacks from happening. There’s also the matter of how the FBI hates the usage of torture—something the CIA isn’t shy about using.

Now, before I forget: yes, I’m aware that mentioning the “official story” with 9/11 in a write-up on something that falls into the realm of a “conspiracy theory” and was even said to have been carried out by Mossad is bizarre. Believe me, it feels bizarre even typing this given the tone of this entire write-up. However, my point, however, isn’t to convey “misinformation” or be contradictory. Ultimately, my point is this: the FBI and CIA aren’t exactly buddies. Whether you’re a fan of either agency (for lack of a better way to put it) or wish both to be liquidated is entirely up to you, though let’s not kid ourselves by saying the two agencies work together in tandem without any employees batting an eye.

Getting back on track: the usage of torture is something that I want to harp on because it’s one reason why I think that FBI Anon’s legitimacy is, to put it lightly, questionable. The CIA has been known to be a lot more blunt and physical. It’s basically The FBI has, on the other hand, is a lot more psychological when interrogating someone. It’s body and mind, but with two agencies that have budgets in the billions.

This difference in questioning someone has often led to a great deal of contention. I’ve heard a story of someone who opened up to an FBI agent because of a tactic that involves befriending the person you’re talking to; it makes them comfortable and gives them a sense of trust in you. However, after the CIA subsequently questioned him, the person demanded they be charged because they waterboarded him. The FBI, needless to say, was none too thrilled.

Now, does this make the FBI some sort of saint? Not really, but that’s the case with any big agency. Good eggs, bad eggs, everything is subject to human flaws. Though I would think that someone who works for what amounts to a rival agency wouldn’t be willing to compliment them.

But, whatever. Let’s move on; it’s entirely possible I was misinterpreting FBI Anon. Besides, I want to be fair and, as such, let me do just that. You see, I will admit that some of what FBI Anon said is decently compelling. It is true that President Trump had been considering former New Jersey Governor Chris Christie to be his Attorney General (however, the Bridgegate scandal ended up making Trump throw that idea out the window). While I cannot verify if Trump had been considering General Flynn as his Vice President, Trump did pick him as his National Security Advisor. Alas, Flynn was fired not long after and his life since then has been something out of a Tom Clancy novel.

While anyone could’ve really predicted Trump opting to have Christie be in his presidential cabinet, I think that the guess of General Flynn is something a bit too specific. At the same time, I also think it could’ve simply been a lucky guess. It’s also possible the person posting it, while being a LARP, did have some inside knowledge. Whatever the case may be, I think that it’s worth pointing out…

Except, wait. FBI Anon said that they were an analyst. Analysts in the FBI are below special agents. That basically means that FBI Anon was the lowliest of lowly grunts. They were the coffee boy to the secretary who’d whine that their coffee wasn’t blacker than the starless night sky. Then they’d get it splashed in their face and they’d have red markings on them like someone who tried to pick a fight with Mike Tyson. Whoops, guess that’s a bit of an inconvenient factor. Better file that under “OP is dimmer than Vertigo”.

So yeah, something I’d recently learned when writing this is that an analyst is the gruntiest of grunts; the lowliest of lowly peasants. This leaves me to ask: exactly how would someone like this learn information like the Holocaust being faked being only known to those at the top of command? Let’s set aside the whole conspiracy spiel about the Holocaust and focus on that. How does a lowly no name peon learn that the top of command is aware of it? Presumably, he did learn that, though I wouldn’t think that James Comey was telling everyone and their grandmother this stuff. That just strikes me as bizarre and, honestly, has me wondering if I misread/misinterpreted some of what was said due to the atrocious grammar.

Oh well, I digress. Is it possible that FBI Anon is legit? Well, technically, yes. There’s nothing stopping it from being real. It’s not an impossibility. With that said, I think it’s definitely improbable. So, overall, I would say that I believe FBI Anon to have been a complete and total LARP.

One thing I didn’t discuss in the actual write-up, but mentioned at the very start during the little warning I gave, was that something like FBI Anon can be influential or influence the general public. Personally, I don’t think FBI Anon himself ended up swinging anyone’s personal opinion on who they wanted to vote for, but I do think the precedent that was set with them definitely had a major impact. The reason for that is with the next thing I want to go over: Q.

This is, without a shadow of a doubt, easily the part that I’ve thought about the most: was FBI Anon the progenitor to QAnon? Personally, I’d say yes. Heck, I think it’s even possible the two are the same person. Though at the same time, I cannot prove this.

Q is something that I’ve followed for a great deal of time, though I’ve never read into everything that’s been posted. I think it’s a fascinating movement to bear witness to and I don’t think anything will ever come close to being as awe-inspiring and, at times, downright baffling. Actually, I think the entire “Where We Go 1 We Go All” movement is something to behold.

I digress though. Such factors are irrelevant when it comes to the question: are these two in some way connected? Well, in my eyes, I think that the two are in some way connected, whether by inspiration or by the person who ran both (should they be LARPs/trolls). I’d say that their styles feel similar, though Q’s grammar is significantly better. Such a factor isn’t that major though. Anyone can type poorly or learn to type properly. Though deep down, my gut tells me the two are connected. It’s a funny little feeling I have. Sorry I can’t elaborate more on it, it’s just something that I feel is true.

On one final note: given that this falls into the category of being a conspiracy, I want to state that this is simply my take on this. As is the case with any conspiracy, I encourage you to do your own research and not blindly listen to me. I consider myself to only be the messenger, not judge, jury, and executioner. I won’t criticize you either; I’m willing to accept anything you guys believe—so long as you don’t accuse me of being FBI Anon. Please, don’t flatter me with the thought that I could work at a place like the Bureau. They’d fire me the second they found this blog.


Stories like FBI Anon are some of my favorites. Whether they’re real or not is, to me, irrelevant. It’s always so fun to read through them because of how crazy they can get. I’ve read one about a supposed FBI agent who claimed they had contact with an alternate reality where they exchanged intel to aid each other in a war against China. It would make for an awesome book if you ask me—as would this one. The FBI is corrupt to its core and one agent has the perfect opportunity to spill the beans.

Okay, so maybe it’s a bit cliché, but I’d be willing to read it. What of you though, oh dear reader? Would you read a book like that? Also, do you believe that FBI Anon was legit or a LARP? Let me know and all of that other stuff. Until next time, take care and don’t fed post on this blog.

No comments:

Post a Comment